A brush with our nation's crumbling infrastructure

Comments

[this is good]

Wow. Give 'em hell, Redz.

Why is there a toilet in your yard?

[this is good]
Shit! This is not very encouraging, when are people going to pull their heads out of their arses???

(lol at the farting sparrow).


You wouldn't LOL at a farting sparrow who'd just blown the transformer in your backyard. Little bastards.

And I have toilet in my backyard for emergencies. Nooo...really, it's because I just replaced the toilet in my basement and I didn't want it sitting in my driveway until the trash guys take it away.
I'm surprised you're functional enough to write a post (and to write it so well) after the very little sleep you would have had.
Actually, I would LOL very loudly at the farting sparrow who just blew my transformer. Of course, then, I would curse him. :D
I've been reading about the whole tax thing a little and how it applies, a guy wrote how America had the highest corporate taxation of any company in the world in 2005, the three countries below it were Japan, Canada, and Germany. Now his argument was of course that we're highest in taxing and that's totally bad because all the businesses are going to shut down or leave for lower taxed countries. So I pointed out the other 3 countries and that they seemed to do pretty durn good business and companies weren't shipping out in droves to go hang out in Rwanda or some other place where business taxes are at .3%.

If taxes payed for nothing but lining greedy politicians pockets then absolutely they should be lowered, but one has to consider what they are paying for. I actually considered a world where Governments decided to privatize care and maintenance of roads and lifted all taxation associated with highways. Corporations of course would only charge the people who were driving, but how much would they charge? Where would they set up their toll booths and what speed limits would they set?

It's also interesting that generally businesses and the wealthy (who can operate out of anywhere they want) choose to live and operate in higher taxed areas as a rule. This is because the benefits of a solid infrastructure outweigh the loss in revenue.

So my general stance is that I don't always see taxing less to be the answer, I'd rather see smarter infrastructures that get that tax money to divisions that need it with minimal bureaucratic wastage. Which technically is what John McCain has been preaching, it just becomes a point of whether or not he can back up his statements.
Oh hey, when did you switch back to your Old Tokyo banner? I just noticed it.
Question: Is it the city's job to fix the pole or the utility's job?

I think in my neck of the woods it would be the electric utility, but I could be wrong

Maybe the City owns the electric utility (?).

[this is good]

You're sooo one of those NIMBY people. :-P

That would freak me out to have the transformer in my back yard. Not that I would mind it being there, but I would also be nervous about a rotten electrical pole that's ready to collapse at any moment. That sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.

In this case, because of its location, it's the city's responsibility. I only know this because the first time it happened, I asked the work crew why they didn't need permission to go in my backyard and they said, "Because we're city employees and this is municipal egress property." (We don't have alleys in our neighborhood, so our yards run right into the strip of land that would be an alley and so is technically municipal property.
[das ist gut]
Remorse that I didn't buy a boat.
Yep, next time I buy property it won't be a house, it will be a houseboat. On stilts. Just in case.

And the infrastructure fairy. It would be funny if I didn't live in Kansas, land of the eternal Republican promise not to raise taxes, no matter what.

[this is good]
*prints post.. awaits next moronic dittohead to stop by*... *stands up on desk and cheers*... *ignores staring*

You have municipal egrets? Cool.

Oh wait. That's not what you said.

Maybe some of the taxes we're already paying could be spent on infrastructure instead of war. Just a thought.

Here in California, they always try to take transportation funds away to pay for all the other BS they want add to the already "over the limit" State budget.

Taxes have never been an issue with me for the same reasons you pointed out in this article. I'm discouraged at how we waste tax dollars, but never surprised by it. The best argument against new taxes is "I'll give the govt more $ when they show me they can spend my current tax $ wisely" but that isn't realistic... logical, yes. practical, yes. frustrating, yes. but not realistic

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

RedScylla

About Me

RedScylla
United States
So... some very polite lawyers for the Japanese toy company Toho tell me I can't use the Godzilla graphic anymore. Or any dinosaur or lizard graphic. I've been a bad girl.
Yahoo!:
redzillaattacks AT yahoo DOT com

Neighborhood

  • crankypants
  • IG
  • Laurie
  • t
  • arbed

Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.

Archives

  • Powered by Vox